From your first link, this quote below proves me right and you wrong. In 2012, Romney got 56% of the rich vote.
"In 2012, by contrast, Obama won low-income voters, those making less than $30,000, decisively, 63-35, but also did far better than Dukakis among those making more than $100,000, winning 44 percent of their votes. Four years earlier, in 2008, Obama won among voters with the highest incomes, above $200,000, 52-46, and nearly tied among those making $100,000 to $200,000, 48-50"
Your second link has nothing to do with voting patterns and party membership. Nothing.
Try again, tard.